Pajhwok Services

Photo Service

SMS News Service

Pajhwok combines its expertise and experience in news reporting with a telecom firm and thus reach a wider audience in an 
effective way.

To subscribe: 
English News Update : Send 83 to 824
Dari News Update : Send 84 to 824
Pashto News Update : Send 85 to 824

Election Coverage

Special Mining Page

Afghan Peace Process Special Page

Addvertise With Pajhwok

Daily Newsletter

Language
Sending Time (GMT / Kabul time)

Suggest a Story

Pajhwok is interested in your story suggestions. Please tell us your thoughts by clicking here.

US wasted up to $60bn in Afghanistan, Iraq

US wasted up to $60bn in Afghanistan, Iraq

By
On
Sep 01, 2011 - 15:19

WASHINGTON (PANinfo-icon): As much as $60 billion in US funds has been lost to waste and fraud in Iraq and Afghanistaninfo-icon over the past decade through lax oversight of contractors, poor planning and corruption, an independent panel investigating US wartime spending estimates.

In its final report to Congress, the Commission on Wartime Contracting said the figure could grow as US support for reconstructioninfo-icon projects and programs wanes, leaving both countries to bear the long-term costs of sustaining the schools, medical clinics, barracks, roads and power plants already built with American tax dollars.

Much of the waste and fraud could have been avoided, the commission said. Government agencies should overhaul the way they award and manage contracts in war zones so they don’t repeat the mistakes made in Iraq and Afghanistan, the commission said. Among the report’s 15 recommendations are the creation of an inspector general to monitor contracting during contingency operations and the appointment of a senior government official to improve planning and coordination.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of the commission’s 240-page report in advance of its scheduled public release on Wednesday.

Created by Congress in 2008, the eight-member commission held more than two dozen hearings, interviewed hundreds of military and civilian officials and traveled multiple times to Iraq and Afghanistan. The panel’s final report is the most comprehensive examination so far of the US dependence on contractors and the government’s ability to manage them in combat areas.

The commission said calculating the exact amount lost through waste and fraud is difficult because there is no commonly accepted methodology for doing so. But using information it has gathered over the past three years, the commission said at least $31 billion has been lost and the total could be as high as $60 billion. The commission called the estimate “conservative.”

Overall, the commission said spending on contracts and grants to support US operations in Iraq and Afghanistan is expected to exceed $206 billion by the end of the 2011 budget year. Based on its investigation, the commission said contracting waste in Afghanistan ranged from 10 percent to 20 percent of the $206 billion total. Fraud during the same period ran between 5 percent and 9 percent of the total, the report said.

Styled after the Truman Committee, which examined Worldinfo-icon War II spending six decades ago, the commission was vested with broad authority to examine military support contracts, reconstruction projects and private security companies. But the law creating the commission also dictated that it would cease operating at the end of September 2011, even as the US operations in Iraq and Afghanistan continue to be heavily supported by contractors.

Sens. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and James Webb, D-Va., introduced the legislation to establish the commission. Webb is scheduled to speak when the report is unveiled Wednesday.

McCaskill, who chairs the Senate’s contracting oversight subcommittee, said in a statement emailed Tuesday that “it is disgusting to think that nearly a third of the billions and billions we spent on contracting was wasted or used for fraud.” She said she will begin to work immediately to implement the commission’s recommendations.

The commission cited numerous examples of waste, including a $360 million US-financed agricultural development program in Afghanistan. The effort began as a $60 million project in 2009 to distribute vouchers for wheat seed and fertilizer in drought-stricken areas of northern Afghanistan. The program expanded into the south and east. Soon the US was spending a id="mce_marker" million a day on the program, creating an environmentinfo-icon ripe for waste and abuse, the commission said.

Paying villagers for what they used to do voluntarily destroyed local initiatives and diverted project goods into Pakistaninfo-icon for resale,” the commission said.

The Afghan insurgency’s second largest funding source after the illegal drug trade is the diversion of money from US-backed construction projects and transportation contracts, according to the commission. But the report does not say how much money has been funneled to the insurgency. The money typically is lost when insurgents and warlords threaten Afghan subcontractors with violence unless they pay for protection, according to the report.

The Associated Press reported earlier this month that US military authorities in Kabulinfo-icon believe that $360 million in US tax dollars has ended up in the hands of people the American-led coalition has spent nearly a decade battling: the Talibaninfo-icon, criminals and power brokers with ties to both. The military said that only a small percentage of the $360 million has been garnered by the Taliban and insurgent groups. Most of the money was lost to profiteering, bribery and extortion by criminals and power brokers.

The commission said the risk of greater waste looms as US military forces withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan. New infrastructure and security forces built up with largely with American money will be left behind. Buildings, roads and barracks must be maintained. Army and police forces must be equipped, fed and paid. If the Iraqi and Afghan governments can’t afford the bills, the investment could be squandered, according to the commission.

These enduring costs risk wasting billions of dollars of American taxpayers’ money – possibly dwarfing the tens of billions in waste already incurred – if funding from the Iraqi and Afghan governments or the international donor community cannot cover them,” the report said.

The commission said that in early 2010 there were more contract employees – 262,000 – supporting the departments of Defense and State and the US Agency for International Development in Iraq and Afghanistan than there were military and federal civilian personnel in both countries. But there are other considerations related to what the commission called an “unhealthy over-reliance” on the private sector for combat support and reconstruction work.

Contractors are handling duties that US laws and regulations require government employees to perform, the commission said. For example, agencies often hire contractors to help evaluate or support its management of other contractors. This can create serious conflicts of interests, the report said, underscoring the need for a competent and well-staffed workforce of government acquisition professionals. The reliance on contractors also overwhelms the government’s ability to manage them, the commission said.

Ten years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan have seen the United States using too many contractors for too many functions with too little forethought and control,” the commission said.

The heavy dependence on contractors also obscures the full human cost of war, according to the commission. Contractor deaths and injuries largely have been undercounted and unpublicized by the US government and the media, the report said.

Between October 2001 and July 2011, 2,429 contractors were reported by their employers to have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. There were 6,131 US military fatalities during the same period.

Pentagon spokesman, Col Dave Lapan, said the Department of Defense has already implemented a number of steps to improve contingency contracting based on its own analysis, as well as recommendations from the independent reviews of the Government Accountability Office and the Inspector General and the Commission's previous publications and interim reports.

We share the Commission's commitment to improving wartime contracting; in particular we commend the Commission for shining a spotlight on the risks of overreliance on contractors, on the need to strengthen the contracting function at the agencies, on the value of increasing competition in contracting and on the importance of holding contractors accountable for their performance,” Lapan said.

ma

Related Article


Download “Pajhwok” mobile App, on your smartphone to read and access latest news, features, interviews, videos and photos about Afghanistan.

   

Add new comment

Advertisement

Twitter Update