Pajhwok Services

Photo Service

SMS News Service

Pajhwok combines its expertise and experience in news reporting with a telecom firm and thus reach a wider audience in an 
effective way.

To subscribe: 
English News Update : Send 83 to 824
Dari News Update : Send 84 to 824
Pashto News Update : Send 85 to 824

Election Coverage

Special Mining Page

Afghan Peace Process Special Page

Addvertise With Pajhwok

Daily Newsletter

Language
Sending Time (GMT / Kabul time)

Suggest a Story

Pajhwok is interested in your story suggestions. Please tell us your thoughts by clicking here.

Parliamentarians differ on deal with US

Parliamentarians differ on deal with US

By
On
Nov 20, 2011 - 18:39

KABULinfo-icon (PANinfo-icon): Some Afghan parliamentarians on Sunday supported the Loya Jirgainfo-icon's recommendations on the strategic cooperation pact with the US, but others insisted that American terms and conditions must be made public before the agreement was signed.

The four-day traditional assembly concluded on Saturday with the endorsement of the strategic cooperation agreement between the US and Afghanistaninfo-icon. In a 76-article declaration, the delegates backed the creation of American bases in the country for a decade.

Endorsing the agreement with the US was necessary for maintaining security and strengthening Afghanistan's economy, delegates at the four-day assembly said in the declaration, which underlined respect for the Afghan culture, traditions and religion.

Articles 2 and 3 of the non-binding declaration ask the US to respect Afghanistan's sovereignty, independence and constitution. Nighttime operations should be conducted exclusively by Afghan forces, the statement added.

"I'm supportive of the pact, as long as Afghan National Army and police are unable to protect national borders," said Syed Ishaq Gilani, a legislator from southeastern Paktia province. The secrecy around the US government's terms represented a big question mark, he remarked.

Another lawmaker, Nasima Niazai, believed the pact did not undermine the Afghan constitution and tended to benefit the country. "Since Afghanistan is far from self-reliant, neighbours could easily mount pressure on it. In this context, the agreement is important."

Urging demands of the US should be publicised, a Wolesi Jirgainfo-icon member from northern Baghlan province, Syed Mansoor Naderi, warned interference from neighbouring countries would continue if the accord was not inked.

Ramazan Bashardost, a public representative from Kabul, said the pact should bring strategic benefits to the Afghan government. "It should end the war and the insurgency. It will be possible when Pakistaninfo-icon and Iran stop supporting terrorism."

If confined to assistance of a few billion dollars, delivery of F16 aircraft and training of some Afghan soldiers, the deal would not benefit Afghanistan, because Afghans did not have the capacity to fight against Iranian and Pakistan armies, he remarked.

"We want the US to maintain security, give us money, train our soldiers and prevent interference from our neighbours. But what the US wants from us in return should be made clear," said Abdul Hafiz Mansoor, a parliamentarian from Kabul.

frm/mud

Tags: 

Related Article


Download “Pajhwok” mobile App, on your smartphone to read and access latest news, features, interviews, videos and photos about Afghanistan.

   

Add new comment

Advertisement

Twitter Update